Site icon Center for Teaching, Learning & Engagement

Back to Campus with AI

Four individuals collaborate at a wooden table, surrounded by a tablet, a laptop, and a smart speaker. Sound waves arc around the speaker as they engage in conversation in a brightly lit room.
Gemini. (2026) Gemini Notebook [AI image generator] https://notebook.google/

Learning From Student Ambassadors

Welcome back to a new school year, colleagues! Generative AI continues to be a major conversation on campuses across the country. At the GCC Center for Teaching, Learning, and Engagement (CTLE), we are dedicated to supporting student success by helping you grow professionally and explore new teaching strategies. Lately, we have heard many questions from faculty about AI. Some faculty feel excited to use these tools, while others worry about academic honesty.

To find a constructive path forward, our team had the opportunity to attend a webinar titled ‘Back to Campus with AI: Learning From Student Ambassadors.’ Here is some of what we learned. Instead of just making rules from the top down, the featured presenter (Denison University in Ohio) brought students directly into the discussion to co-create solutions. Those that attended the webinar were left with the idea that perhaps we can listen to our students and build classrooms where everyone feels trusted, supported, and ready to learn.

Bringing Students to the Table

Our community college serves a wonderful and diverse group of learners. Often, institutions talk about students rather than with them when making AI guidelines. At Denison University, they took a different approach by starting a Student AI Ambassador Program. They hired ten student leaders from different majors and academic years to help guide the campus AI strategy.

These student ambassadors sat down with campus leaders, contributed to official guidelines, led peer workshops, and developed educational resources. Here are a few of the things they discovered:

There Is No Single Student Perspective

It is easy to assume that all students use AI in the same way, but their attitudes actually vary widely based on their disciplines. The webinar highlighted two major groups:

!!SURPRISING CAMPUS DATA!!
Denison University conducted a year-long campus survey. They found that the number of active student AI users actually dropped from 93% to 72% in one year. As students attended AI literacy workshops, they became more critical of the technology. They did not just use it blindly; they started asking hard questions about ethics, accuracy, and environmental costs.

What Students Want: Clarity, Not Just Access

A common worry among faculty is that students just want free access to AI tools. However, the student ambassadors shared that what students actually crave is clear guidance on what responsible use looks like in each course. 

One of the ambassadors, a biology major on the pre-med track, explained how confusing it is for students when every professor has a different, unspoken policy. One class allows AI, another bans it, and a third says nothing at all. The ambassadors suggested a simple solution: treat AI guidelines exactly like textbook rules in your syllabus. Specify if a physical textbook or an e-book is needed, and do the same for AI. 

Explain exactly when AI is allowed, such as during the brainstorming phase, and how students should declare its use. Providing clear expectations replaces student fear of being falsely accused of cheating with shared language and mutual trust.

Immediate Classroom ‘Micro-Moves’ for Faculty

Based on these lessons, here is a quick-start guide of immediate actions you can implement in your courses. These micro-moves build transparency and encourage critical thinking.

Classroom ChallengeImmediate Action (Micro-Move)
Unclear AI Expectations
Students feel confused and anxious because expectations vary widely across courses.

The AI Syllabus Section
Add a clear, separate section to your syllabus explaining exactly where, when, and how AI can be used (e.g., brainstorming only, full use, or zero use) and how to cite it.
Superficial Shortcut Use
Students use AI as a ‘ghostwriter’ to generate entire drafts without learning the material.


Grade the Process, Not Just Output
Break large assignments into progressive steps. Ask students to submit their AI chat logs, explain their prompt decisions, and write brief reflections on how they verified the AI’s claims.
Blind Reliance on Technology
Students grab AI out of convenience, forgetting how to solve problems on their own.

The AI-Free Week / Task
Set aside one week or one specific task to be completed entirely without AI. Follow it with a collaborative classroom discussion about what skills require a human touch.

Two Exciting Classroom Experiments to Adapt

To foster deep critical thinking, consider adapting two creative campus experiments shared by the Denison student ambassadors:

Co-Building the Future of Education

Education can be a collaborative journey. Shifting our perspective from ‘how do we block AI’ to ‘what can we build together with our students’ opens up incredible possibilities. By giving students meaningful responsibility, they develop leadership, critical thinking, communication, and career-connected skills. Let’s embrace this opportunity to co-design our courses, co-build our guidelines, and learn alongside our student partners. We are excited to walk this path with you!


Resources

ChatGPT and Gemini were used to create this blog post. (Image, brainstorming, outlining, and final copy edit)


Looking for a thought partner?
The CTLE team can help you generate new ideas, revise assignments, and thoughtfully integrate AI into your teaching. We are here to support you!
Connect with us to get started.

Exit mobile version